cpp-peglib ========== C++11 header-only [PEG](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing_expression_grammar) (Parsing Expression Grammars) library. *cpp-peglib* tries to provide more expressive parsing experience than common regular expression libraries such as std::regex. It also keeps it in mind that users can easily start using it. The PEG syntax that *cpp-peglib* understands is described on page 2 in the [document](http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/parsing:popl04.pdf). How to use ---------- What if we want to extract only tag names in brackets from ` [tag1] [tag2] [tag3] [tag4]... `? It's a bit hard to do it with `std::regex`. We have to write a loop logic, since it doesn't support [Repeated Captures](http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_57_0/libs/regex/doc/html/boost_regex/captures.html#boost_regex.captures.repeated_captures). PEG can handle it pretty easily. PEG grammar for this task could be like this: ``` ROOT <- _ ('[' TAG_NAME ']' _)* TAG_NAME <- (!']' .)+ _ <- [ \t]* ``` Here is how to parse text with the PEG syntax and retreive tag names: ```c++ // (1) Include the header file #include "peglib.h" // (2) Make a parser auto parser = peglib::make_parser(R"( ROOT <- _ ('[' TAG_NAME ']' _)* TAG_NAME <- (!']' .)+ _ <- [ \t]* )"); // (3) Setup an action std::vector tags; parser["TAG_NAME"] = [&](const char* s, size_t l) { tags.push_back(std::string(s, l)); }; // (4) Parse auto ret = parser.parse(" [tag1] [tag:2] [tag-3] "); assert(ret == true); assert(tags[0] == "tag1"); assert(tags[1] == "tag:2"); assert(tags[2] == "tag-3"); ``` You may have a question regarding '(3) Setup an action'. When the parser recognizes the definition 'TAG_NAME', it calls back the action `[&](const char* s, size_t l)` where `const char* s, size_t l` refers to the matched string, so that the user could use the string for something else. We can do more with actions. A more complex example is here: ```c++ // Calculator example using namespace peglib; using namespace std; auto parser = make_parser(R"( # Grammar for Calculator... EXPRESSION <- TERM (TERM_OPERATOR TERM)* TERM <- FACTOR (FACTOR_OPERATOR FACTOR)* FACTOR <- NUMBER / '(' EXPRESSION ')' TERM_OPERATOR <- [-+] FACTOR_OPERATOR <- [/*] NUMBER <- [0-9]+ )"); auto reduce = [](const vector& v) -> long { long ret = v[0].get(); for (auto i = 1u; i < v.size(); i += 2) { auto num = v[i + 1].get(); switch (v[i].get()) { case '+': ret += num; break; case '-': ret -= num; break; case '*': ret *= num; break; case '/': ret /= num; break; } } return ret; }; parser["EXPRESSION"] = reduce; parser["TERM"] = reduce; parser["TERM_OPERATOR"] = [](const char* s, size_t l) { return (char)*s; }; parser["FACTOR_OPERATOR"] = [](const char* s, size_t l) { return (char)*s; }; parser["NUMBER"] = [](const char* s, size_t l) { return stol(string(s, l), nullptr, 10); }; long val; auto ret = parser.parse("1+2*3*(4-5+6)/7-8", val); assert(ret == true); assert(val == -3); ``` It may be helpful to keep in mind that the action behavior is similar to the YACC semantic action model ($$ = $1, $2, ...). In this example, the actions return values. These samentic values will be pushed up to the parent definition which can be referred to in the parent action `[](const vector& v)`. In other words, when a certain definition has been accepted, we can find all semantic values which are associated with the child definitions in `const vector& v`. The values are wrapped by peblib::Any class which is like `boost::any`. We can retrieve the value by using `get` method where `T` is the actual type of the value. If no value is returned in an action, an undefined `Any` will be pushed up to the parent. Finally, the resulting value of the root definition is received in the out parameter of `parse` method in the parser. `long val` is the resulting value in this case. Here are available user actions: ```c++ [](const char* s, size_t l, const std::vector& v, const std::vector& n) [](const char* s, size_t l, const std::vector& v) [](const char* s, size_t l) [](const std::vector& v, const std::vector& n) [](const std::vector& v) []() ``` `const std::vector& n` holds names of child definitions that could be helpful when we want to check what are the actual child definitions. Make a parser with parser operators and simple actions ------------------------------------------------------ Instead of makeing a parser by parsing PEG syntax text, we can also construct a parser by hand with *parser operators* and use the *simple action* method rather than the semantic action method. Here is an example: ```c++ using namespace peglib; using namespace std; Definition ROOT, TAG, TAG_NAME, _; ROOT = seq(_, zom(TAG)); TAG = seq(chr('['), TAG_NAME, chr(']'), _); TAG_NAME = oom(seq(npd(chr(']')), any())); _ = zom(cls(" \t")); vector tags; TAG_NAME.match = [&](const char* s, size_t l) { tags.push_back(string(s, l)); }; auto ret = ROOT.parse(" [tag1] [tag:2] [tag-3] "); ``` In fact, the PEG parser generator is made with operators. You can see the code at `make_peg_grammar` function in `peglib.h`. The following are available operators: | Description | Operator | |--------------------|----------| | Sequence | seq | | Prioritized Choice | cho | | Grouping | grp | | Zero or More | zom | | One or More | oom | | Optional | opt | | And predicate | apd | | Not predicate | npd | | Literal string | lit | | Character class | cls | | Character | chr | | Any character | any | Tested Compilers ---------------- * Visual Studio 2013 * Clang 3.5 TODO ---- * Linear-time parsing (Packrat parsing) * Optimization of grammars * Unicode support Other C++ PEG parser libraries that inspired cpp-peblib ------------------------------------------------------- * [PEGTL](https://github.com/ColinH/PEGTL) - Parsing Expression Grammar Template Library * [lars::Parser](https://github.com/TheLartians/Parser) - A header-only linear-time c++ parsing expression grammar (PEG) parser generator supporting left-recursion and grammar ambiguity License ------- MIT license (© 2015 Yuji Hirose)